Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Investigating and evaluating the physical resilience of urban spaces against earthquakes (Case study: Mashhad city)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D student of Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran
Abstract
Introduction

One of the most fundamental and threatening hazards is earthquakes. The risk of earthquakes is one of the most significant dangers that constantly threaten cities. Therefore, understanding the current state of resilience plays a vital role in reducing urban vulnerability and enhancing citizens' ability to cope with the risks posed by natural disasters. This is because earthquakes occur suddenly and can have widespread impacts across a region, even affecting national issues. The most critical factors leading to a crisis during an earthquake are the physical vulnerabilities of the city.
Among these, Mashhad in Razavi Khorasan is one of the major and important cities in Iran, located in a very high-risk zone. Its proximity to 55 active and seismic faults, along with a population of over 3,057,679, and the presence of vast human, cultural, and religious assets, have positioned Mashhad as a highly significant city in terms of seismic risk. The Razavi Khorasan region, structurally, lies within the tectonic zones of Kopet Dag, Binalud, and Sabzevar (subzones of Central Iran). In all three zones, there are highly active and dynamic faults. Movements along these faults can lead to severe earthquakes with substantial damage.
Additionally, for the religious metropolis of Mashhad, with its large population and vast area, factors such as unprincipled excavations, lack of attention to building safety, the presence of deteriorated structures in most parts of the city, poor-quality construction materials, inadequate design and construction of buildings and vital infrastructure relative to potential seismic intensity, lack of operational plans and capabilities for disaster management during response and recovery phases, and numerous vulnerable and deteriorated areas have made resilience, particularly in terms of physical aspects, a critical issue.
Over the past two decades, various multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods based on Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have been developed to assess urban resilience against earthquake risks. Therefore, research on the physical resilience of urban spaces in Mashhad against earthquakes using these methods and approaches is essential. The results can be used in formulating laws and regulations related to natural disaster management, vulnerability reduction, risk mitigation policies, and enhancing resilience, as well as in decision-making, planning, and policy-making by officials in Mashhad regarding natural disaster management.
 

Methodology

This research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of method. Data collection is done through library studies (documents) and statistical information collection which includes documents, observation and documentation. The information required in this research is collected through library method. Most of the information related to the indicators of this research was obtained by referring to the Statistics and Information Analysis Department of the Human Capital Development and Planning Deputy of Mashhad Municipality, using the Mashhad City Statistics in 2023. The statistical population of the present study is experts and elites of Mashhad city; 20 people were selected through a purposeful method. Arc GIS software, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model, and Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) method were used to analyze the data
 

Results

The final output of Mashhad city's vulnerability to earthquakes shows that 1147 hectares (3.55%) are in a completely unsuitable condition and only 2155 hectares (6.66%) are in a completely suitable condition. According to the results, among the seventeen districts of Mashhad city, districts 7 and 9 have the highest level of vulnerability.
 

Discussion

In this study, indicators such as the ratio of building height to street width, access to open spaces, access to service centers (fire stations, etc.), population density, distance from healthcare facilities, distance from faults, distance from gas stations and fuel depots, building age, location in dead-end alleys, type of facade materials, and access to main city roads were examined. These indicators are determining factors that reflect the level of vulnerability in different urban areas. By using this set of factors and defining their boundaries, vulnerable areas of the city were identified.
The results showed that 1,147 hectares (3.55%) are in a completely unsuitable condition, 7,964 hectares (24.64%) are in an unsuitable condition, 15,254 hectares (47.21%) are in a moderate condition, 5,789 hectares (17.91%) are in a suitable condition, and only 2,155 hectares (6.66%) are in a completely suitable condition. According to the results, among the seventeen districts of Mashhad, districts 7 and 9 have the highest vulnerability, while districts 4 and 16 have the lowest vulnerability.
 

Conclusion

The overall results indicate that Mashhad, like many other cities, is located on several active faults, making it a sensitive and high-risk area for earthquake hazards. Sooner or later, the city will face such a challenge. Therefore, reducing damage, managing crises, and ultimately enhancing the resilience of cities against hazards such as earthquakes is essential and necessary.
 
Acknowledgments
This research did not receive any specific grant. From funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Keywords

Abdi, Z., Ashnoi Noushabadi, A., Maskini, A. (2022). Assessment of physical resilience using the TOPSIS-AHP model with an emphasis on housing (a case study of the country's cities). Safe City, 5(1), 1-24.  doi:10.22034/ispdrc.2022.254318 (In Persian)
Adger, W. N., (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in human geography, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK, 24 (3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465
Ahmadi, Z, Ghasemi, M, Khavarian-garmsir. A.R, Ahmadi, M, (2024), integrating flood and earthquake resilience: a framework for assessing urban community resilience against multiple hazards, Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 5(3): 330-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.05.002. (In Persian)
Allan, P., & Bryant, M. (2010). The critical role of open space in earthquake recovery: a case study. In EN: Proceedings of the 2010 NZSEE Conference (2010, Nueva Zelandia) (pp. 1-10).‏ https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/TheCritical-Role-of-Open-Space-in-Earthquake-A-Allan-Bryant/90495244704ff29c627ee1aecb58434ce7b48f40
Antonioni, G., Spadoni, G., & Cozzani, V. (2007). A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events. Journal of hazardous materials, 147(1-2), 48-59.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.043
Badrazar, S, Hosseinzadeh Dalir, K. & Azar, A. (2021). Evaluation of vital impulses affecting earthquake resilience in Iranian metropolises (Case study: Tabriz metropolis). Geography (Regional Planning), 11(42), 871-890. 20.1001.1.22286462.1400.11.2.46.6
Banica, A., Rosu, L., Muntele, L., & Grozavu, A., (2017). Towards Urban Resilience: A Multi- Criteria Analysis of Seismic Vulnerability in Lasi City. (Romania). Sustainability 2017, 9, 270. RePEc: gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:270-:d:90385
Burton, C.G. (2015). A validation of metrics for community resilience to natural hazards and disasters using the recovery from Hurricane Katrina as a case study. Annals of The Association Of American Geographers, 105(1), 67–86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24537949
Gharakhlou, M., (2009), crisis risk in urban slum, CAG, ETAVA, Canada, 25-31.
Haseli, S. Pourkhabbaz, H, & Azmi, A. (2024). Evaluating Urban Resilience against Earthquakes (Case Study: Islamabad Gharb). Geography and Urban Space Development, 11(2), 139-159. doi: 10.22067/jgusd.2023.78320.1241. (In Persian)
Heydari, M. T., Hatami, H., Tahmasebi Moghadam, H. and akbari, B. (2024). Evaluating the Physical Resilience of the Central Texture of Cities against Hazards (Case Example: District 8 of Shiraz City). Geography and Urban Space Development, 10(4), 61-82. doi: 10.22067/jgusd.2022.73288.1124
Heydarifar, M., & Razayi, N. (2017). The Needing to Attend Environmental Hazards from the View of National Security (Emphasizing the Environmental Security). Environmental Law, 2(1), 38-49. https://enlaw.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_4227.html?lang=en. (In Persian)
Heydarifar, M.R, Solimani rad, E, Hosseinisiahgoli, M. (2020). Investigating the Role of Natural Hazards and Crisis Management in Land Management (Case Study: Kermanshah Province). Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies (JSURDS), 1(1), 55-76. https://www.srds.ir/article_122918.html?lang=en. (In Persian)
Hook, A., Court, V., Sovacoo, B., & Sorrell, S. (2020). A systematic review of the energy and climate impacts of teleworking. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), 89-119. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8a84
Kärrholm, M., Nylund, K., & de la Fuente, P. P., (2014). Spatial resilience and urban planning: Addressing the interdependence of urban retail areas, Cities, London, England, 36, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.012
Kourti, N., Kempner, T., Marin Ferrer, M., Luoni, S., Antofie, T., Georgios, T., Negro, P., Giannopoulos, G., Galbusera, L., Krausmann, E., Girgin, S., Theocharidou, M. (2019). Strategies for improving Urban Resilience in Europe, 13th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP13Seoul, South Korea, May 26-30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332682497_Strategies_for_improving_Urban_Resilience_in_Europe.
Maleki, S., Razavii, S. M., & Ramazanpour Asadieh, K. (2022). Measurement and Evaluation of Resilience to Earthquake Urban Areas (Case Study: Western District of Izeh City). 12(47), 187-202. doi: 10.30495/jupm.2022.4231. (In Persian)
Mohaqeqi, P, Ghadami, M, Azimi amoli, J, & Janbaz Ghobadi, G. R. (2021). An investigation of earthquake resilience with an emphasis on urban form: A case study on District 12 of Tehran. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 8(29), 245-273. doi: 10.22080/usfs.2021.3445. (In Persian)
Peyvastehgar, Y., Jafari, H., & Moradi, E. (2023). Explaining the dimensions of urban physical resilience against earthquakes based on multi-criteria decision making methods studied in Yasouj.13(51),73-88.
doi: 10.30495/jupm.2022.30043.4139. (In Persian)
Pourahmad, A, Ziyari, K, & Sadeghi, A. (2018). Spatial Analysis of Physical Resilience Components of Urban attrited/beaten tissues against Earthquakes (Case Study: District 10 of Tehran Municipality). Spatial Planning, 8(1), 111-130. doi: 10.22108/sppl.2018.109941.1178. (In Persian)
Sarvar, H, & Kashani asl, A. (2016). Evaluation of ahar city's physical vulnerability against earthquake crisis. Environmental based territorial planning (amayesh), 9(34), 87-108. sid. https://sid.ir/paper/130684/en. (In Persian)
Shahpari Sani, D., Heidari, M. T., Tahmasebi Mogaddam, H., Nadizadeh Shorabeh, S., Yousefvand, S., Karmpour, A., & Jokar Arsanjani, J. (2022). An Assessment of Social Resilience against Natural Hazards through Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Geographical Setting: A Case Study of Sarpol-e Zahab, Iran. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14), Article 8304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148304
Sun, J, Zhai, N, Mu, H, Miao, J, Li, W, Li, M, (2023), Assessment of urban resilience and subsystem coupling coordination in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, Sustainable Cities and Society, Volume 100, January 2024, 105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105058
Tavasoli, O, Asakereh, A, & Tavasoli, N. (2023). Seismic Hazard Analysis and Preparation of Risk Spectrum in Mashhad for Design, Construction Urban and Suburban Infrastructures. Journal of Transportation Research, 20(4), 155-166. doi: 10.22034/tri.2023.115391. (In Persian)
Tokakisa, V, Polychronioua, P, Boustras, G, (2019). Crisis management in public administration: The three phases model for safety incidents, Safety Science, 28(113): 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.013
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction), (2016). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters, Extract from the final report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction.