Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Comparative Study of Karst Geomorphosites in Kermanshah Province Using GAM and M-GAM Models

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to compare the karst geomorphosites of Kermanshah province based on the two key indicators of core values ​​and complementary values using Vojisic 2011 Geosite Evaluation Model (GAM) and Tamik Modified Model (M-GAM) and Bozic 2014. The research type is applied and has been done by descriptive-analytical method (with field survey technique). The study area includes 6 geosites of Kermanshah province (Rijab waterfall, Bistoon mirage, Taghbestan mirage, Gilat-e-Gharb mirage, Sahneh mirage and Ghori Qaleh cave) which have rich environmental foundations for the development of geotourism. The results showed that the geomorphosites have appropriate scientific / educational and aesthetic value, but in terms of tourism values, the geomorphosites of the study area are not in a favorable condition. The Taghbestan mirage is in a good condition in terms of core values ​​and complementary values. Also, the geomorphosites of Sarab Biston and Quri Qaleh cave are in a relatively good condition from this point of view, while in general, most geomorphosites of the study area has a higher core value and a lower complementary value. In other words, these geomorphosites can only be considered as potential tourist attractions in terms of scientific / educational, aesthetic values ​​and need to promote sustainable tourism. Overall, the evaluation results of the models show a completely vague and deceptive picture of the current situation. The findings indicate that the inclusion of tourists in the modified model of geomorphosites gives a more realistic and clear picture that can be useful in improving and planning the tourism activities of the province's geosites.
Keywords

۱. اسفندیاری، فریبا، عباسی، هوشنگ؛ موسوی، معصومه؛ شهبازی، ابوطالب؛ حسینی، مهدی، ۱۳۹۱. "بررسی قابلیت‌های ژئومورفوتوریسم اشکال کارستیک در استان کرمانشاه"، اولین همایش انجمن ایرانی ژئومورفولوژی,۶-۳.
۲. الماسی، سمیه. ۱۳۸۸. پتانسیل سنجی ژئوتوریسم و ژئوپارک در استان کرمانشاه، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، ۱۴۳.
۳. رحیم‌پور، علی. ۱۳۸۵. "زمین گردشگری". نشریه مسافران، شماره ۳. ۶۱-۵۸.
۴. سبزواری، آزاده. ۱۳۹۳. ارزیابی توانمندی‌ها و قابلیّت‌های ژئوتوریسم در توسعه پایدار (مطالعه موردی: سراب دربند در شهرستان صحنه). فصلنامه جغرافیای طبیعی، شماره ۲۶، ۸۶-۶۵.
۵. محمدخان، شیرین، ویسی، عبدالکریم؛ ریاحی، سمانه. ۱۳۹۶. پتانسیل‌سنجی قابلیت‌های ژئوسایت‌های توده کوهستانی شاهو با بکارگیری مدل GAM، مجله مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، شماره ۳۸، ۱۱۰-۸۳.
۶. معتمد، احمد و مقیمی، ابراهیم. ۱۳۹۶. "کاربرد ژئومورفولوژی در برنامه ریزی". تهران: انتشارات سمت، چاپ سوم، ۱۵۲ ص.
۷. برزگر، ابراهیم. ۱۳۸۶. "مطالعات میان رشته‌ای در ایران". تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی. چاپ اول، ۲۸۶ ص.
8. Bruschi, V. M., & Cendrero, A. 2005. “Geosite evaluation; can we measure intangible values”. IL Quaternario .18(1). 293-306.
9. Cendrero, A. and Panizza, M. 1999. “Geomorphology and environmental impact assessment: an introduction”. Supplementi di Geografia Fisica Dinamica Quaternaria. 3. 167-172.
10. Coratza, P., & Giusti, C. 2005. Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. IL Quaternario. 18(1). 307-313.
11. Coratza, P., Bruschi, V. M., Piacentini, D., Saliba, D. and Soldati, M. 2 01 1. “ Recogn ition and assessment of geomorphosites in Malta at the Il-Majjistral nature and history Park". Geo heritage. 3. 175–185.
12. Grandgirard, V. (1999). “L évaluation des géotopes”.Geologia Insubrica, 4, 59-66.
13. Grandgirard, V. and Szepesi, A. 1997. “ Geomorphology and management of natural heritage (the protection of the geotopes, a new task in geomorphology”. Noosfera. 3. 59–65.
14. Gray, M. 2004. “ Geodiversity. Valuing and conserving abiotic nature”. Chichester: Wiley.
15. GSR, 2006. “ Geotourism in Scotland – evaluation and development. Phase 2 – Knockan Crag customer survey”. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report. No 170.
16. Hose, T. A. 1994. “ Telling the story of stone—assessing the client base. Geological and landscape conservation”. Geological Society. London. 451-457.
17. Hose, T. A. 1997. “ Geotourism - selling the earth to Europe”. Engineering geology and the environment. 2955–2960.
18. Kavčič, M. and Peljhan, M 2010. “Geological heritage as an integral part of natural heritage conservation through its su s tain able u se in th e Idrija region (Slovenia)”. Geoheritage, 2, 137–154.
19. Lima, F., Brilha, J. and Salamun, E. 2010. “Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: a methodological proposal applied to Brazil”. Geoheritage. 2. 91–99.
20. Moufti, M. R., Németh, K., El-Masry, N. and Qaddah A. 2013. “Geoheritage values of one of the largest maar craters in the Arabian Peninsula: the Al Wahbah Crater and other volcanoes (Harrat Kishb, Saudi Arabia)”. Central European Journal of Geosciences. 5. 2. 254-271.
21. Panizza M. 2001. “ Geomorphosites: Concepts, Methods and Examples of Geomorphological Survey”.Chinese Science Bulletin. 46.PP 4-6.
22. Panizza, M. and Piacente, S. 2003b. “Geomorphological Assets Evaluation”. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie. 87.13–18.
23. Pellitero, R., Gonzalez-Amuchastegui, M. J., Ruiz-Flano,P. and Serrano, E . 2011 . “ Geodiversit y and geomorphosite assessment applied to a natural protected area: the Ebro and Rudron Gorges Natural Park (Spain)”. Geoheritage. 3.163–174.
24. Pereira, P., Pereira, D. and Caetano Alves, M. I. 2007. “ Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal)”. Geographica Helvetica. 62.
25. Pralong, J. P. 2005. “A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites”. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement. 3. 189-196.
26. Pralong, J. P. 2006. “ Research approaches concerning the guiding image of “Protection through Use” in geoparks and geotouristic destinations”. Regional wissens chaft liche Forschung. 31. 51-55.
27. Reis, R. P. and Henriques, M. H. 2009. “Approaching an integrated qualification and evaluation system for geological heritage”. Geoheritage. 1. 1–10.
28. Reynard, E. 2005. “Geomorphosites et paysages”. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement. 3. 181–188.
29. Reynard, E. 2008. “Scientific research and tourist promotion of geomorphological heritage”. Geografia fisicae dinamica quaternaria. 31. 2.
30. Reynard, E. and Panizza, M. 2005. “Geomorphosites: definition, assessment and mapping. An introduction”. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement. 3. 177-180.
31. Reynard, E., Fontana, G., Kozlik, L. and Scapozza, C. 2007. “A method for assessing „scientific” and additional values” of geomorphosites”. Geographica Helvetica. 5. 62-63.
32. Rivas, V., Rix K., Francés, E., Cendrero, A. and Brunsden D. 1997. “Geomorphological indicators for environment impact assessment: consumable and non -consumable geomorphological resources”. Geomorphology. 18. 169-182.
33. Rocha, J., Brilha, J., & Henriques, M. H. 2014. “Assessment of the geological heritage of Cape Mondego natural monument (Central Portugal)”. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 125(1). 107-113.
34. Serrano, E. and González-Trueba, J. J. 2005. “Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain)”. Geomorphology. Formes, processus, environnement. 3. 197-208.
35. Stürm, B. 1994. “The geotope concept: geological nature conservation by town and country planning”. Geological and Landscape Conservation. Proceedings of the Malvern International Conference. London: Geological Society. pp. 27-31.
36. Tomić, N. 2011. “The potential of Lazar Canyon (Serbia) as a geotourism destination: inventory and evaluateon”. Geographica Pannonica. 15. 3. 103-112.
37. Tomić, N., & Božić, S. 2014. “A modified geosite assessment model (M-GAM) and its application on the Lazar Canyon area (Serbia)”. International Journal of Environmental Research. 8(4). 1041-1052.
38. Vujičić, M. D., Vasiljević, Dj. A., Marković, S. B., Hose, T. A., Lukić, T., Hadžić, O. and Janićević, S. 2011. “Preliminary geosite assessment model (GAM) and its application on Fruška Gora Mountain, potential geotourism destination of Serbia”. Act a Geographica Slovenica. 51. 361-377.
39. Zouros, N. C. 2007. “Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. The case of the Lesvos island coastal geomorphosites”. Geographica Helvetica. 62. 169-180