Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Assessment and comparison of pressures and threats of Lorestan province mountain-protected areas

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor Department of Fisheries and Environment Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Master's student in the field of environmental science and engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction

Today, the result of human struggle with nature is some phenomena such as biological diversity loss, environmental pollution, and the continuous exploitation of environmental resources, which is based on the improper use and irrational management of land by humans. Because natural resources as the basis of life and sustainable development have many commercial and non-commercial values and also its role in the life of biological communities, including humans, is noticeable, hence sustainable and optimal exploitation of these resources is necessary. Protected areas are essential to preserve biodiversity, and considering the threats that are spreading in these areas, the issue of their management efficiency is very important. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) studies on threats to protected areas in 2000 show a correlation between inadequate management and the degree of threat to protected areas.

Methodology

Based on the RAPPAM methodology, the current research has identified and graded the pressures and threats of Sefidkooh and Oshtrankooh protected areas and the Samandar Lorestani wildlife refuge in Lorestan province. According to the RAPPAM guidance document, pressure includes an activity, event, or forceful damage that currently has a detrimental effect on the ecosystem integrity in the protected area. It should be noted that pressure can be caused by the direct or indirect effect of a legal or illegal activity. The threat includes a potential or imminent pressure that will cause harmful damage to the ecosystem and its components in the near future. Based on the RAPPAM methodology, the rating of pressure and threat can reach a score of 1 to 64 by multiplying the three parameters of effect range, effect intensity, and effect permanence.
Most of the questions used a scale with four standard choices (no = 1, often no = 2, often yes = 3, yes = 4), where "yes" describes an ideal situation.

Results

16 pressure and threat factors were identified in the Oshtorankooh protected area and scored by experts. In the Oshtrankooh protected area, illegal hunting had the highest degree of pressure and threat (35.07). While the lack of distinct agriculture boundaries had the lowest degree of pressure and threat (18.03). Among the 25 pressure and threat factors of the Sefidkooh protected area, drought, and climate change had the highest rating of pressure and threat (45.89), and the wildlife fodder supply in the winter had the lowest rating of pressure and threat (12.96). Between 11 pressure and threat factors of the Lorestani salamander wildlife refuge, drought, and climate change had the highest degree of pressure and threat (43.89). In contrast, diseases and parasites had the lowest degree of pressure and threat (16.42).

Discussion

The results show that the Sefidkooh protected area is exposed to more damage and threats. This region has a large area and it's located under the boundary of three cities Azna, Dore Chegeni, and Khorramabad. Because the protected area has a large area, there are three separate decision-making departments, and the lack of specialist staff and facilities is strongly felt, as a result, the protected area has many pressure and threat factors and its area and wildlife are decreasing. After the drought and climate change, the lack of expert staff and facilities has assigned the highest degree of pressure and threat (41.46). Then, the lack of land use planning was given third place with a score of 40.89. The results show that the implementation of land capacity evaluation studies and protected area zoning can contribute to better protection. By informing people and their participatory management of zones adjacent to rural areas, conservation, and sustainable use is encouraged.

Conclusion

To monitor pressures and threats in protected areas of Lorestan province, the RAPPAM methodology was implemented. This methodology provided by the World Wide Fund (WWF) for nature can be implemented with the lowest cost and will provide useful results. The most important Sefidkooh protected area pressures and threats were drought, climate change, and lack of specialists and facilities. In the Oshtrankooh protected area, illegal hunting, and unsustainable tourism were the most important factors. Drought, climate change, illegal fishing, and hunting were identified as the most obvious pressure and threat factors. of Lorestani salamander wildlife refuge. To implement this method, it is suggested that the experts attend the workshops. It is also suggested that the sections related to biodiversity, socio-economic issues, management, and policy-making which are in the continuation of the RAPPAM questionnaire should be carried out in these areas.
Keywords

Abukari, H., & Mwalyosi, R. B. (2018) Comparing pressures on national parks in Ghana and Tanzania The case of Mole and Tarangire National Parks. Global Ecology and Conservation, 15, e00405.
 
Afriyie, J. O., Asare, M. O., Danquah, E., & Pavla, H. (2021). Assessing the management effectiveness of three protected areas in Ghana. Conservation and Society, 19(1), 13-24.
Banjac, N., Maksimović, R., Dragaš, K., & Ivetić, J. (2019). Monitoring and assessment of protected areas’ management capacities in the Republic of Serbia. Sustainability, 11(3), 666.
Cheraghi, M., Hamidi, K, (2019). Conservation and sustainable exploitation of natural resources, an important step in sustainable development, 10th International Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran. https://civilica.com/l/10566/ (In Persian)
Dudley, N. (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. x + 86pp. WITH Stolton, S., Shadie, P., & Dudley, N. (2013). Guidelines for applying protected area management categories including IUCN WCPA best practice guidance on recognising protected areas and assigning management categories and governance types. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 21, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Xxpp.
Ervin, J. (2003). Rapid assessment of protected area management effectiveness in four countries. BioScience, 53(9), 833-841.
Gungor, B. (2007). Management system of protected areas for sustainable use of natural resources. J. of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 8(2), 434-441.
Hadipour, M., Kabudandpour, Sh. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of Dena protected area management and providing a suggested model for evaluating the effectiveness of management applied in Iran's protected areas, The First National Conference on Planning and Environmental Protection, Hamadan, https: //civilica.com/doc/19271
Hockings, M., Stolton, S., & Dudley, N. (2000). Evaluating effectiveness. A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. Reihe: World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA): Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series, 6.
Hockings, M., (2006). Evaluating Effectiveness: A framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. IUCN.
Kabudandpour S., Hadipour M, (2013): Evaluating the effectiveness of Dana protected area management and providing a suggested model for evaluating the effectiveness of management applied in Iran's protected areas, the first national conference on environmental protection and planning. (In Persian).
Li, D., Zhou, J., Dong, K., Wu, B., & Zhu, C. (2003). China: management effectiveness assessment of protected areas in the Upper Yangtze ecoregion using WWF’s RAPPAM methodology. Gland, Switzerland: WWF.
Lorestan Province Department of Environment, (2024). https://www.doe.ir/
Makhdoom, M. (2004): The Foundation of Land use planning, Tehran University Press. (In Persian).
Mohseni, F., Sabzghabaei, G. and Dashti, S., 2019. Management effectiveness and conservation prioritizing the protected areas using RAPPAM methodology (case study: Khuzestan province). Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191(3), p.138.
Phillips, A, (2002). Management Guidelines for IUCN Category V Protected Areas: Protected Landscapes/Seascapes. IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Xv + 122pp.
Sabzghobai, G. H., Mohseni F., Dashti, S. (2017): Evaluating the effectiveness of management of protected areas in the continuation of sustainable development (Study by Dez, Shimbar, Karaei), Journal of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, No. 82. (In Persian)
Spinola C, Lessa Soares A., Reis R, (2020): Evaluation of the management of conservation unit: An analysis of the RAPPAM cycles of the amazon national parks, Ethnobiology and Conservation. DOI: 10.18224/baru. v8i1.8711.
WWF, International Workshop on Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas June 14-16 1999, CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica Hosted by WWF Central America Regional Office.