Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Evaluation of geotourism potential of Sepidan County, Fars Province, Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Geographical Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Hormozgan, Bandarabbas, Iran.
10.22034/gsma.2025.2055406.1069
Abstract
1. Introduction
In addition to its recreational dimension, tourism is an opportunity for economic mobility; therefore, it has become a top priority in development planning (Chim-Miki et al., 2020). As a branch of tourism, geotourism emphasizes the identification of special tourist sites from a geological and geomorphological perspective (Mokhtari et al., 2020). It is based on the identification and exploitation of tourist attractions with an emphasis on landforms and processes, focusing on the combination of cultural, historical, and ecological heritage with special tourist sites (Mokhtari et al., 2020); The goal is to identify and prioritize attractions, assess their capabilities, and ultimately manage geomorphosites (Amini Gheshlaghi et al., 2022), to achieve sustainable development of this industry (Mokhtari et al., 2020).
The Iranian Plateau, with its geological background and unique geographical location, has diverse capabilities for geotourism development (Golimokhtari et al., 2018). It appears that the geomorphological attractions of Sepidan County, Fars Province, along with its cultural, social, and biological characteristics, have created a suitable potential for the development of geotourism. However, some of these geosites are not given due attention. In response to this issue, the hypothesis is proposed that despite the appropriate geomorphological attractions, more focus needs to be placed on geosite management issues in the development of geotourism. To address this, geosite evaluation models were used to examine the capabilities and criteria involved in the development of geotourism in the region, emphasizing two groups: intrinsic values and management values. An attempt was made to determine how management values influence the promotion of the geotourism capabilities of these geosites.
In general, the purpose of this research is to identify and introduce the most important attractions and criteria affecting their capabilities to enhance the geotourism exploitation of the region. Obviously, if the capabilities of geomorphological attractions are considered in the tourism development programs of the county, there will be a greater chance of success in increasing their geotourism values.
2. Methodology
Two methods, library and field survey, were used to collect the necessary data. The data collection tools included interviews and questionnaire completion. In completing the questionnaires, 30 individuals were selected from the statistical community of experts and related specialists using purposeful sampling. The Pereira model was also utilized as a data analysis tool.
First, potential geosites in the region were identified through library studies, field visits, and interviews with knowledgeable individuals. After identifying the geosites, they were evaluated based on the information obtained from field surveys and the opinions of experts (questionnaires), employing the Pereira method (Pereira et al. 2007).

3. Results
In the final evaluation of the geotourism potential of Sepidan County, derived from the sum of the geomorphological and management factors, Margoon Waterfall is in the most favorable condition with a final value of 16.02. Chikan Waterfall ranks second with a value of 11.72, while Lake Barm Firuz is in last place with a value of 6.88.
In examining the geomorphological factors of the geotourism potential of the county, it is observed that Margoon Waterfall is in the most favorable condition, while Tang Gamil is in the worst condition. Additionally, in comparing the management factors of geomorphosites, Margoon Waterfall remains in the most favorable condition, whereas Chellegah is in the worst condition.

4. Discussion
The Pereira model was used to examine the geomorphological and management scores of selected geomorphosites in Sepidan County. In this model, the maximum geomorphological and management score that can be assigned to a geomorphosite is 10, resulting in a total score of 20. It appears that, apart from Margoon Waterfall, which ranks first by a significant margin, half of the selected geomorphosites have a relative potential higher than 10. The rest are in a condition relatively close to the average.
The average geomorphological score of the geomorphosites is 5.47, while their average management score is 3.95 out of 10. Despite the appropriate geomorphological scores, special attention must be given to management issues in the development of geotourism in Sepidan County. With the exception of Margoon Waterfall, the protection score of most of these sites is less than 1.5, and in some cases, it is below 0.75 out of 3, indicating that management of these sites requires improvement. Additionally, some sites lack the necessary infrastructure for overnight or multi-day stays, which has diminished their usability and consequently their management scores.

5. Conclusion
In general, it seems that the geomorphological capabilities of most selected sites have the potential to attract geotourists; however, their management scores and values need to be strengthened. It is essential to improve facilities and infrastructure, such as water, electricity, and roads, and to create a foundation for attracting private sector investment in developing welfare facilities at these sites.

Author Contributions
In the preparation and writing of this article, all authors (first, second, and third) have contributed equally and jointly. All stages of the research, from study design and data collection to analysis of results and final writing of the article, are the result of collaboration and collective agreement of all authors.
Data Availability Statement
Data available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgements
This article is an extract from the M.Sc thesis of the field of Ecotourism, University of Hormozgan. We are very grateful to everyone who assisted us in conducting this research.

Ethical Considerations
All authors affirm that this research was conducted in accordance with ethical standards, with no data fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism.

Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Keywords

Amini Gheshlaghi, D., rahimi herabadi, S. and panahi, H. (2022). Presenting an optimal model of geotourism management with a security approach in karst areas (Case study: Namakdan Cave in Qeshm Geopark). Journal of police Geography, 9(36), 173-204. doi: 10.22034/pogra.2022.1266237.1322 [In Persian].
Ashrafi, M., Moradi, A., Akbarian, M. and Rezaei, M. (2024). Evaluation of the Features of Geographical and Biogeotourism Heritage of Landscapes in Order to Develop Wetland Ecotourism in the International Wetlands of Hormozgan. Desert Management, 12(2), 67-84. doi: 10.22034/jdmal.2024.2025472.1457 [In Persian].
Babolimoakhar, H., Ramesht, M. (2019). Evaluation of Geotourism Capabilities of the Teshan Region of Behbahan County Based on the Prolong Method in Order to Achieve Sustainable Development,.Physical Geography Quarterly, (43),53-70. [In Persian].
Bahar, A. M. A., Udin, W. S., Hussin, H., Sulaiman, N., Sulaiman, N (2020) Geomorphosite assessment of Renyok River, Jeli, Kelantan. Proceedings of the 2th International Conference on Tropical Resources and Sustainable Science. August 10-11, University of Malaysia, Kelantan, 549(1): 12-23.
 Biswas, T., Swarna, k, Harinarayana, T. (2013). Development of Geotourism in Kutch Region, Gujarat, India: An Innovative Approach, Journal of Environmental, pp 1360- 1372
Bouzekraoui, H., Barakat, A., Touhami, F., Mouaddine, A., El Youssi, M (2018) Inventory and assessment of geomorphosites for geotourism developmentt: A case study of Aït Bou Oulli valley (Central High‐Atlas, Morocco). Area, 50(3): 331-343.
Chim-Miki, A. F. Medina-Brito, P. and Batista-Canino, R. M. (2020), Integrated Management in Tourism: The Role of Coopetition, Tourism Planning and Development, 17 (2), 127-146. Unversity of science and Technology‚Al. mickiewcza.30.
Ebrahimi, A., Mokhtari, D. and Roostaei, S. (2022). Potential Assessment of Areas Prone to Geotourism Development and Providing Optimal Patterns of Visiting Geosites in Kamyaran City. Geography and Environmental Planning, 33(3), 87-102. doi: 10.22108/gep.2022.131774.1475 [In Persian].
Fooladi, F. (2024). Evaluation of Geotourism Capabilities of Sepidan County, a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Studies Office in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Ecotourism, University of Hormozgan, 105p. [In Persian].
GoliMokhtari, L., Bahramabadi, E., and solgi, L. Comparative study of the geotourism abilities of Aleshtar city using Pralong and Perira models, Geography and Development, 16, 52, 2018, 69-96. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2018.4110 [In Persian].
Górska-Zabielska, M. (2023). A New Geosite as a Contribution to the Sustainable Development of Urban Geotourism in a Tourist Peripheral Region—Central Poland. Resources, 12(6), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12060071
Imani, B. (2022). Formulating Management Model in Geotourism with an Emphasis on Entrepreneurship in Rural Areas (Case Study: Mahallat City). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 20(2), 193-167. doi: 10.22067/jgrd.2022.51158.0[In Persian].
Jahantigh S, Karam A, Ghanavati E. (2022). Explanation of tourism capabilities and management for geosites on based assessment method of geodiversity sites. jgs. 22(65), 303-323. doi:10.52547/jgs.22.65.303 URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2758-fa.html [In Persian].
Karam, A., & Mihanparast, E. (2022). Geotourism potential propagation of Taleghan region using Kubalikova method. Regional Planning, 12(46), 17-32. doi: 10.30495/jzpm.2022.5370 [In Persian].
Kardavani, P., Farajirad, A., Kavoosi, B. (2016). Geotourism in Mazandaran Province with an Emphasis on Nowshahr Port, New Approaches in Human Geography, (3),1-21. [In Persian].
Mastika, I. K., Harsono, S. S., Khristianto, W., Oktawirani, P., & Hutama, P. S. (2023). Creative strategies of local resources in managing geotourism in the Ijen Geopark Bondowoso, East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 149-168.
Medai, N., Okamoto, N., Ogasawara, Y. and Hihara,K. (2022).Factors Contributing to Tourism Demand at Major Japanese Hot Springs, Plos one,17(9): 24-39.
Miśkiewicz, K. (2024). Geotourism Product as an Indicator for Sustainable Development in Poland. Sustainability, 16(13), 5516. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135516
Mokhtari, D. (2014). Geotourism, Tabriz University Press, Tabriz, Iran. [In Persian].
Mokhtari, D., rostaei, S. and emamikia, V. (2020). Analysis of the relationship between the tourism motivations of the Tabriz metropolitans’citizens and their tourism destinations in East Azerbaijan by geo tourism approach. Geography and Development, 18(59), 171-184. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2020.5471 [In Persian].
Pereira, P., et al. (2007). Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geo-graphica Helvetica, 62(3), 159-168.
PTO, Polish Tourism Organization. 2025. Available online: https://www.pot.gov.pl (accessed on 16 July 2024). [Polish].
Rajabi, M. and Rangraz Forough, F. (2024). Estimating the Geotourism Capabilities of the Hot Springs of East Azarbaijan Province for the Development of Health Tourism. Hydrogeomorphology, 11(39), 80-59. doi: 10.22034/hyd.2024.60075.1722 [In Persian].
Rasouli, A., Vahabzadeh Kebria, G., Musavi, S. R. and Roshun, S. H. (2023). Evaluation of capabilities and development of geotourism in Khatirkuh region using SWOT-ANP and QSPM analysis. Watershed Engineering and Management, 15(2), 242-263. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2022.356495.1925 [In Persian].
Shahmohammadi, N., Akbarian, M., & Mirzade Kouhshahi, M. (2024). Evaluating the Geotourism Potential of Spa Springs in the Bastak and Larestan Counties Area. Regional Planning, (PerePrint Onlin), doi: 10.30495/jzpm.2024.33304.4331 [In Persian].
Silva, F., Herrera, M. A. M., Rosina, K., Barranco, R., Freire, S., & Schiavina, M. (2018). Analyzing spatiotemporal patterns of tourism in Europe athigh-resolution with conventional and big data sources. Tourism Management, 68 (2), 101-115.
Statistical Yearbook of Fars Province, (2021), Statistical Center of Iran. [In Persian].
Taghilo, A. A., Asghari, S., Soltani, N. and Aftab, A. (2018). Analysis and Evaluation of Geotouristic Potentials of Zarivar Lake. Geography and Environmental Planning, 28(4), 17-32. doi: 10.22108/gep.2017.98276.0 [In Persian].
VahabzadahKbriya, G. (2022). Geotourism and Geoparks: A New Strategy for Land Use Planning and Management within Watersheds. Land Management Journal, 10(2), 135-144. doi: 10.22092/lmj.2022.125986 [In Persian].
VahabzadahKbriya, G. and Mosavi, S. R. (2022). Evaluation of geotourism potential of Espahbod Khorshid Cave, forest and surrounding river based on Peralong and Kochin models in Savadkouh city. New Findings in Applied Geology, 16(31), 97-112. doi: 10.22084/nfag.2021.24024.1463 [In Persian].
Yamani, M., Azimirad, S., & Bagheri Seyed Shakari, S. (2012). Investigating Geotourism Capabilities of Geomorphosites in Saymarreh Region Using Pralong Method. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 2(1), 69-88. [In Persian].