Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas

Analysis of the Social Capital of Local Stakeholders' Network in the Context of Watershed Co-Management(Case Study: Khoda Afarin District)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Natural Resources Policy-Making, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj. Iran.
2 Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
3 Department of Architecture, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
5 Rural Development Center, Natural Hazards Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/gsma.2026.2061446.1085
Abstract
1. Introduction
Watershed management is an integrated approach for protecting water and soil resources, improving ecosystems, and reducing environmental risks. Co-management, involving local stakeholders, is vital for addressing water scarcity and climate change. Trust among stakeholders is crucial for decision-making, and Social Network Analysis (SNA) helps assess collaboration. Economic, social, and land ownership factors influence participation. Khoda Afarin faces soil erosion and floods, requiring trust-based strategies, yet research gaps remain. This study analyzes trust networks to enhance watershed management.

2. Methodology
Khoda Afrin District, located in the northeastern part of East Azerbaijan Province, borders the Republic of Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Ardabil Province. With a population of approximately 34,977 people, this region faces significant challenges, including widespread migration and a decline in job opportunities. The economy of the region is primarily dependent on agriculture and livestock farming. However, climate change and soil erosion have resulted in a decrease in productivity. Projects such as the Khoda Afrin Dam and the Aras Free Zone have had an impact on the development of the. The Aras River is the main source of water, but soil erosion and frequent floods pose serious threats. Integrated watershed management is essential to address these challenges and achieve sustainable development through co-management.
The research method of this study is a mixed-methods approach, utilizing both survey and applied methods. Data were collected through a social network analysis questionnaire, face-to-face interviews, and direct observation. The statistical population consists of 40 members of the Rural Development and Progress Association in three villages: Sharfe, Bastamlou, and Dormoshkelano. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by expert opinions, and its reliability was verified with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 92%. To evaluate the components of social capital, a Likert scale was used. Social network analysis, using UCINET software, was employed to examine the relationships among stakeholders and design participatory management. Various network indices, such as density, centralization, and average geodesic distance, were analyzed to assess interactions and natural resource management.

3. Results
The results of the study showed that in the selected villages, the highest population is in the age group under 40, with Bostamlou having the highest percentage of people under 40, and Sharfe having the highest percentage of people aged 50 to 60 and over 60. Regarding gender distribution, in all the villages, men outnumber women, and the greatest gender disparity was observed in the village of Sharfe. Additionally, Bastamlou has a more balanced gender distribution compared to the other villages. Regarding household structure, Bastamlou has the highest percentage of large households, while Dormoshkelano has the highest percentage of small households. In terms of social networks, Bastamlou has the highest trust network density, while Dormoshkelano has the highest collaborative network density. In examining the concentration of in-degree and out-degree in social networks, Bastamlou has the highest in-degree concentration in the collaborative network. In Dormoshkenlo, the highest out-degree concentration is in the trust network, and in Sharfe, the in-degree concentration in both trust and collaborative networks is evenly distributed. Finally, the reciprocity, transferability, and average geodesic distance indices also indicated differences in the trust and collaborative networks among the villages.

4. Discussion
The findings of the research indicate that the structure of social networks among local stakeholders in the three studied villages impacts the success of participatory management. In the village of Bastamlou, with a younger population and larger households, there is greater social cohesion and trust, leading to higher participation. In contrast, in the village of Sharfe, with an older population and smaller households, the networks are weaker, and participation is lower (Persdzink et al., 2022). The analyses show that in Bastamlou, participation and trust are more evenly distributed, and the relationships are more stable, while in Sharfe and Dormoshkelano, the high concentration of certain individuals in the networks leads to reduced cooperation and cohesion (Ghobani et al., 2025). Additionally, the transitivity of ties in Bastamlou is higher, contributing to greater network stability and participation, while in Sharfe, this transitivity is lower. The findings also indicate that the reduction in geodesic distance in Bastamlou facilitates faster exchange of information and participation (Jiang et al., 2015; Ari et al., 2024).

5. Conclusion
The results of the analysis of the social networks of local stakeholders in three villages of Khoda Afarin district show that the existence of dense networks and bidirectional, stable relationships are key prerequisites for effective participatory management in the watershed area. The village of Bastamlou, with greater social cohesion and more active participation, offers an appropriate model. To improve other villages, strengthening social capital and building trust among stakeholders is essential. It is recommended to identify central actors and hold educational workshops to create stronger social networks. Additionally, in villages with an older population, new social ties should be established. These findings align with the research of Jarrigo et al. (2024), which has shown that high social capital leads to increased trust and improved decision-making processes in natural resource management.

Author Contributions
In the preparation and writing of this article, all authors have contributed equally and jointly. All stages of the research, from study design and data collection to analysis of results and final writing of the article, are the result of collaboration and collective agreement of all authors.

Data Availability Statement
Data available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to everyone who assisted us in conducting this research.

Ethical Considerations
All authors affirm that this research was conducted in accordance with ethical standards, with no data fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism.

Funding
This research was conducted with the support of the Natural Disasters Research Institute and the Social Business Institute of the University of Tehran. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude and appreciation to these institutions for their valuable support.

Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Keywords

Abbasi Rostami, A., Yazdani Nah, M., Abdshahi, A., Azizi Khalkhili, T., & Soleimani, M. (2022). Social network analysis of stakeholders in the governance of integrated agricultural water resources management in Mazandaran Province. Watershed Management Research Journal, 13(25), 197–214. (In Persian) http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jwmr.13.25.197
Abdillah, A., Widianingsih, I., Buchari, R.A., & Nurasa, H. (2024). Collaborative strategies for sustainable management of the Citarum Watershed in Indonesia: a Quintuple Helix approach. Discover Sustainability, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00240-3
Abunyewah, M., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O., Okyere, S. A., Thayaparan, G., Byrne, M., Lassa, J., Zander, K. K., Fatemi, M. N., & Maund, K. (2023). Influence of personal and collective social capital on flood preparedness and community resilience: Evidence from Old Fadama, Ghana. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 94, 103790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103790
Allen, E., Kruger, C., Leung, F.-Y., & Stephens, J. C. (2013). Diverse perceptions of stakeholder engagement within an environmental modeling research team. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 3(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0136-x
Amirentekhabi, Sh., Javan, F., & Naimabadi, N. (2017). Social capital and sustainability of rural areas in Kashmar County. Quarterly Journal of Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 6(20), 79–96. https:// doi.org/10.22034/jsrd.2017.123456
Amirkafi, M. (2001). Social trust and its influencing factors. Research Index, 18, 9–42. (In Persian)
Ansink, E., Tesfaye, A., Bouma, J., & Brouwer, R. (2017). Cooperation in watershed management: A field experiment on location, trust, and enforcement. Resource and Energy Economics, 50, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.07.002
Ari, I. R. D., Prayitno, G., Fikriyah, F., Dinanti, D., Usman, F., Prasetyo, N. E., ... & Onishi, M. (2024). Reciprocity and Social Capital for Sustainable Rural Development. Societies, 14(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14020014
Ashtari, H., Ghorbani, M., Khorasani, M. A., & Ghafari, S. (2024). Dynamic Analysis of Organizational Cohesion in the Implementation of the Development and Advancement Rural Plan (Case Study: Gachsaran County). Journal of Rural Research, 15(2), 382-397. (In Persian) http://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2024.377112.1950
Bekele, A., Aticho, A., & Kissi, E. (2018). Assessment of community-based watershed management practices: Emphasis on technical fitness of physical structures and its effect on soil properties in Lemo district, Southern Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-018-0124-y
Bekele, Y., Kebede, B., & Kuma, T. (2023). Assessing the role of community participation in integrated watershed management in Dandi Lake watershed, Dandi district, West Showa, Oromia, Ethiopia. Applied Water Science, 13, 207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-02009-x
Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114
Bodin, Ö., & Prell, C. (2011). Social networks in natural resource management: What’s there to learn from a structural perspective? Cambridge University Press.
Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008
Cheng, Y., Ma, F., & Du, C. (2010). Integration of adaptive approaches for sustainable watershed management. Advanced Materials Research, 113–116, 1243–1249. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.113-116.1243
Church, S. P., & Prokopy, L. S. (2017). The influence of social criteria in mobilizing watershed conservation efforts: A case study of a successful watershed in the Midwestern U.S. Land Use Policy, 61, 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.030
Cudjoe, D., & Wang, H. (2024). Public acceptance towards plastic waste-to-energy gasification projects: The role of social trust and health consciousness. Journal of Environmental Management, 361, 120737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120737
Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., & Snijders, T. A. (2019). Transitivity correlation: A descriptive measure of network transitivity. Network Science, 7(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2019.32
Ebrahimi, F., Ghorbani, M., Salajegheh, A., & Mohseni Saravi, M. (2014). Analysis of the social network of local stakeholders in the participatory water resource management action plan: A case study of the Jajrud River in the Latian watershed—Darbandsar village. Journal of Watershed Sciences and Engineering, 8(25), 47–56. (In Persian) https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20089554.1393.8.25.1.0
Fatemi, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2021). Social networks’ analysis of rural stakeholders in watershed management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(5), 7652–7675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01399-9
Fatemi, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2021). Social networks’ analysis of rural stakeholders in watershed management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(12), 17535–17557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01399-9
Floress, K., Prokopy, L. S., & Allred, S. B. (2011). It’s who you know: Social capital, social networks, and watershed groups. Society & Natural Resources, 24(9), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903493926
Fox, S., Qillaq, E., Angutikjuak, I., et al. (2020). Connecting understandings of weather and climate: Steps towards co-production of knowledge and collaborative environmental management in Inuit Nunangat. Arctic Science, 6(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2020-0003
Ghorbani, M., Bouzarjomehri, K., Evazpour, L., & Mansouri, Z. (2017). The efficacy of community-based management approach toward strengthening bridging social capital and reducing social exclusion (Case Study: Rigan County, Kerman Province). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 6(2), 157–169. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v6i2.58795
Ghorbani, M., Garakani, S. A. H., Hamidi, M., Amiri, S., & Rahimi, M. (2025). Evaluation of the social capital of local communities in line with the governance of the land (Study area: Taftan city). Journal of Range & Watershed Management, 78(1). (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2024.291226.1759
Ghorbani, M., Roghani, R., & Dehbozorgi, M. (2015). Institutional network analysis in regional policy-making of Zagros dry forests (Case study: Boyer-Ahmad County). Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 68(3), 615–623. (In Persian)  https://doi.org/10.22059/jfwp.2015.55593  
Gorris, P., & Koch, L. (2024). Building trust in environmental co-management: Social embeddedness in a contested German biodiversity conservation governance process. Environmental Science & Policy, 154, 103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103695
Hanson, C. E., Palutikof, J. P., Dlugolecki, A., & Giannakopoulos, C. (2006). Bridging the gap between science and the stakeholder: The case of climate change research. Climate Research, 31(1), 121–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr031121
Hardy, S. D. (2022). Power to the people: Collaborative watershed management in the Cuyahoga River Area of Concern (AOC). Environmental Science & Policy, 129, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.020
Hardy, S. D. (2022). Transaction costs for collaboration in the watershed management of the Cuyahoga River Area of Concern. Regional Sustainability, 3(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2022.07.005
Hatala, J. P. (2006). Social Network Analysis in Human Resource Development: A New Methodology. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 45–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534484305284318
Ikhlas, N., & Ramadan, B. S. (2024). Community-based watershed management (CBWM) for climate change adaptation and mitigation: Research trends, gaps, and factors assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140031
Imperial, M. T. (1999). Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: The institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management, 24(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900248
Indrawati, D. R., Supangat, A. B., Purwanto, Wahyuningrum, N., & Subandrio, B. (2022). Community participation in soil and water conservation as a disaster mitigation effort. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1109(1), 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/17551315/1109/1/012030
Islami, I., Azadi, H., Flores Díaz, A. C., & Sadrabad, H. S. (2023). Collaborative water management through revitalizing social power relationships: A social network analysis of Qanat stakeholders in Iran. Irrigation Science, 42, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00856-9
Jiang, B., Zhang, Z. L., & Towsley, D. (2015, August). Reciprocity in social networks with capacity constraints. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 457–466). https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2783410
Karki, R., Kalin, L., Srivastava, P., Rowles, K., Masters, M., & Bartels, W.-L. (2025). Stakeholder-driven assessment of watershed management strategies for agriculture and ecological sustainability: A case study in the lower Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) River Basin. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.123628
Khodaie, A., & Zandi, R. (2024). Monitoring temporal changes of land use in Khoda Afarin and Kalibar cities using remote sensing technology. Environmental Sciences, 22(2), 225–244. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.48308/envs.2023.1341
Koontz, T. M., Steelman, T. A., Carmin, J., et al. (2004). Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government? RFF Press.
Kumar, A., Capraro, V., & Perc, M. (2020). The evolution of trust and trustworthiness. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.12948
Leahy, J. E., & Anderson, D. H. (2008). Trust factors in community–water resource management agency relationships. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(2), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.05.004
Leahy, J. E., & Anderson, D. H. (2008). Trust factors in community–water resource management agency relationships. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(2), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.05.004
Lemos, M. C., Kirchhoff, C. J., & Ramprasad, V. (2012). Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1614
Li, Q., Igbokwe, K. N., & Li, J. (2013). Community-based integrated watershed management. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 11(1), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2005.10677407
Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F., & Ingold, K. (2013). Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.052
Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15410072.2004.00069.x
Mandarano, L., & Paulsen, K. (2011). Governance capacity in collaborative watershed partnerships: Evidence from the Philadelphia region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(10), 1293–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.572694
Margerum, R. D., & Robinson, C. J. (2015). Collaborative partnerships and the challenges for sustainable water management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.003
Maya Jariego, I. (2024). Using stakeholder network analysis to enhance the impact of participation in water governance. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02958-x
Mengistu, F., & Assefa, E. (2021). Community participation in watershed management: Analysis of the status and factors affecting community engagement in the upper Gibe basin, South West Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(2), 252–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1762550
Mirzaei, A., Knierim, A., Nahavand, S. F., & Shemshad, M. (2020). The role of social capital in water reservoirs governance: Evidence from Northern Iran. Human Ecology, 48(4), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00168-y
Mosavi, S., Einali, J. and Javan, F. (2025). Capitals of Local Communities and Tourism-Oriented Economic Development: A case study of Target Villages for Tourism in Zanjan Province. Human Geography Research, 57(2), 65-81. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2024.371800.1008668
Mullen, M. W., & Allison, B. E. (1999). Stakeholder involvement and social capital: Keys to watershed management success in Alabama. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35(3), 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17521688.1999.tb03621.x
Pahlavani, A., Khodaei, A., & Zandi, R. (2022). Evaluation of ecological capability of Khoda Afrin County using Dr. Makhdoum ecological model and geographic information system. Management and Engineering Watershed of Journal, 14(1), 40–54. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwmse.2021.351579.1834
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development, 29(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00098-X
Przesdzink, F., Herzog, L. M., & Fiebelkorn, F. (2022). Combining stakeholder- and social network- analysis to improve regional nature conservation: A case study from Osnabrück, Germany. Environmental Management, 69, 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01564-w
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
Putra, A. K., Susetyo, B. B., & Ngimba, S. D. (2022). Social capital based on local ecological knowledge in the Bompon watershed community. KnE Social Sciences, 7(16), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i16.12182
Ruiz-Ortiz, V., García-Lopez, S., Solera, A., & Paredes, J. (2019). Contribution of decision support systems to water management improvement in basins with high evaporation in Mediterranean climates. Nordic Hydrology, 50(4), 1020–1036. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2019.014
Sadeka, S., Mohamad, M. S., Sarkar, M. S. K., & Al-Amin, A. Q. (2020). Conceptual framework and linkage between social capital and disaster preparedness: A case of Orang Asli families in Malaysia. Social Indicators Research, 150(1), 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02307-w
Sandstrom, A., & Rova, C. (2010). The network structure of adaptive governance: A single case study of a fish management area. International Journal of Co-management, University of Michigan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ijc.156
Shen, S., Qin, C.-Z., Zhu, L.-J., & Zhu, A.-X. (2023). From scenario to roadmap: Design and evaluation of a web-based participatory watershed planning system for optimizing multistage implementation plans of management practices under stepwise investment. Journal of Environmental Management, 118280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118280
Tomer, M. D. (2014). Watershed management. In Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09117-X
Wang, T., Park, S. C., & Jin, H. (2015). Will farmers save water? A theoretical analysis of groundwater conservation policies. Water Resources and Economics, 12, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2015.10.002
Weiss, K., Hamann, M., Kinney, M., & Marsh, H. (2012). Knowledge exchange and policy influence in a marine resource governance network. Journal of Global Environmental Change, 22, 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.007
Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press.
Zeng, D., Chen, B., Wang, J., Innes, J. L., Lu, J., Guo, F., Yan, Y., & Wang, G. (2024). Determinants of public participation in watershed management in Southeast China: An application of the institutional analysis and development framework. Land, 13(11), 1824.